

{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Gestions hospitali\u00e8res","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ricom-web8.com\/gestions","author_name":"Gestions hospitali\u00e8res","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ricom-web8.com\/gestions\/author\/benjamin\/","title":"L\u2019incidence des proc\u00e9dures contentieuses (suite) - Gestions hospitali\u00e8res","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1KIxDaCXvD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ricom-web8.com\/gestions\/lincidence-procedures-contentieuses-suite\/\">L\u2019incidence des proc\u00e9dures contentieuses (suite)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ricom-web8.com\/gestions\/lincidence-procedures-contentieuses-suite\/embed\/#?secret=1KIxDaCXvD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0L\u2019incidence des proc\u00e9dures contentieuses (suite)\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Gestions hospitali\u00e8res\" data-secret=\"1KIxDaCXvD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Dans un article pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent (1), nous avions eu l\u2019occasion de d\u00e9montrer comment les proc\u00e9dures contentieuses influencent les proc\u00e9dures de passation des march\u00e9s et accords-cadres publics. La r\u00e9cente publication du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2009-1456 du 27 novembre 2009 relatif aux proc\u00e9dures de recours applicables aux contrats de la commande publique permet de pr\u00e9ciser le propos et marque la derni\u00e8re \u00e9tape de la transposition en droit interne de la directive dite \u00ab recours&hellip;"}